Chess-Online
 
Компьютерный анализВремя на ходПоделиться и экспортировать
FEN
[Event "Casual correspondence game"] [Site "https://live.chess-online.com/JxDk5F0O"] [Date "2023.09.17"] [White "Amm369"] [Black "lichess AI level 2"] [Result "1-0"] [GameId "JxDk5F0O"] [UTCDate "2023.09.17"] [UTCTime "03:56:53"] [WhiteElo "1500"] [BlackElo "?"] [Variant "Standard"] [TimeControl "-"] [ECO "C50"] [Opening "Italian Game: Paris Defense"] [Termination "Normal"] [Annotator "live.chess-online.com"] 1. e4 Nc6 2. Nf3 d6?! { (0.19 → 1.11) Inaccuracy. e5 was best. } (2... e5 3. Bb5 a6 4. Ba4 Nf6 5. d3 Bc5 6. Bxc6 dxc6 7. O-O) 3. Bc4 e5 { C50 Italian Game: Paris Defense } 4. d3 Nf6?! { (0.47 → 1.23) Inaccuracy. Na5 was best. } (4... Na5 5. Bd5 Be7 6. a3 Nf6 7. Ba2 O-O 8. O-O c5 9. Nc3) 5. Ng5 d5 6. exd5 Nxd5?! { (1.13 → 2.22) Inaccuracy. b5 was best. } (6... b5) 7. Qf3?! { (2.22 → 1.16) Inaccuracy. Nxf7 was best. } (7. Nxf7 Kxf7) 7... f6?! { (1.16 → 2.07) Inaccuracy. Be6 was best. } (7... Be6) 8. Nh3?? { (2.07 → -1.83) Blunder. Qxd5 was best. } (8. Qxd5 Qxd5) 8... Be6 9. a3 a6?! { (-2.34 → -1.37) Inaccuracy. Nd4 was best. } (9... Nd4 10. Qh5+) 10. Bd2?! { (-1.37 → -2.28) Inaccuracy. Nc3 was best. } (10. Nc3 Nd4 11. Qd1 c6 12. Be3 Nf5 13. Nxd5 cxd5 14. Bb3 Qc7 15. c4 dxc4 16. Bxc4 Bxc4) 10... b5 11. Ba2 Nd4 12. Qd1 c5?! { (-1.58 → -0.91) Inaccuracy. Qd7 was best. } (12... Qd7 13. Ng1) 13. Nc3 c4 14. dxc4 Bxh3?? { (-0.92 → 0.97) Blunder. bxc4 was best. } (14... bxc4 15. O-O) 15. gxh3?! { (0.97 → 0.36) Inaccuracy. Qh5+ was best. } (15. Qh5+ g6 16. Qxh3 Nxc2+ 17. Ke2 Nd4+ 18. Kf1 Nxc3 19. Bxc3 Qd7 20. Qxd7+ Kxd7 21. h4 Bd6) 15... Nf4?? { (0.36 → 5.11) Blunder. bxc4 was best. } (15... bxc4 16. Bxc4) 16. cxb5?! { (5.11 → 3.74) Inaccuracy. Bxf4 was best. } (16. Bxf4 exf4) 16... axb5? { (3.74 → 6.37) Mistake. Qe7 was best. } (16... Qe7 17. bxa6 O-O-O 18. O-O Kb8 19. Bxf4 exf4 20. Kh1 Qc5 21. Nd5 Rxd5 22. Bxd5 Qxd5+ 23. f3) 17. Bb3?? { (6.37 → -2.00) Blunder. Bxf4 was best. } (17. Bxf4) 17... Nxb3?! { (-2.00 → -1.11) Inaccuracy. b4 was best. } (17... b4 18. Ba4+) 18. cxb3 Qd4?? { (-1.43 → 2.13) Blunder. Nd3+ was best. } (18... Nd3+ 19. Kf1) 19. Nxb5?? { (2.13 → -11.42) Blunder. Bxf4 was best. } (19. Bxf4 Qxf4) 19... Nd3+ 20. Ke2 Qb6?? { (-9.03 → 0.10) Blunder. Qe4+ was best. } (20... Qe4+ 21. Be3) 21. a4?! { (0.10 → -0.99) Inaccuracy. Nc7+ was best. } (21. Nc7+ Qxc7) 21... Qxf2+?! { (-0.99 → 0.00) Inaccuracy. Rd8 was best. } (21... Rd8) 22. Kxd3 Qf5+ 23. Ke2 Rb8?? { (0.00 → 4.46) Blunder. Rd8 was best. } (23... Rd8 24. Qb1 Qh5+ 25. Ke1 Qh4+ 26. Ke2) 24. Bb4?? { (4.46 → -2.48) Blunder. Be3 was best. } (24. Be3 Rc8) 24... Qh5+?? { (-2.48 → 0.00) Blunder. Bxb4 was best. } (24... Bxb4 25. Qd3 e4 26. Nc7+ Kf8 27. Qg3 Qh5+ 28. Kf1 Rc8 29. Ne6+ Kf7 30. Nxg7 Qa5 31. Qg4) 25. Ke1?? { (0.00 → -5.86) Blunder. Kf2 was best. } (25. Kf2 Qh4+ 26. Kg2 Bxb4 27. Qg4 Qxg4+ 28. hxg4 h5 29. g5 fxg5 30. Rhf1 Bd2 31. b4 Bxb4) 25... Qxh3?? { (-5.86 → 8.00) Blunder. Bxb4+ was best. } (25... Bxb4+ 26. Kf2) 26. Nd6+?? { (8.00 → 0.00) Blunder. Nc7+ was best. } (26. Nc7+) 26... Kd8?? { (0.00 → 6.66) Blunder. Bxd6 was best. } (26... Bxd6 27. Bxd6 Rxb3 28. Qd5 Qe3+ 29. Kf1 Qh3+) 27. Nf7+?? { (6.66 → 0.00) Blunder. Nb5+ was best. } (27. Nb5+ Qd7) 27... Kc8?? { (0.00 → Mate in 6) Checkmate is now unavoidable. Ke8 was best. } (27... Ke8 28. Bxf8 Rxf8 29. Nd6+ Ke7 30. Rg1 Qe3+ 31. Kf1 Qf4+ 32. Ke1) 28. Qd8+? { (Mate in 6 → 8.07) Lost forced checkmate sequence. Rc1+ was best. } (28. Rc1+ Qc3+ 29. Rxc3+ Bc5 30. Rxc5+ Kb7 31. Qd5+ Ka6 32. Qc6+ Ka7 33. Ra5#) 28... Kb7 29. Nd6+?? { (7.80 → -1.13) Blunder. Qd5+ was best. } (29. Qd5+ Ka7) 29... Ka7?? { (-1.13 → Mate in 1) Checkmate is now unavoidable. Bxd6 was best. } (29... Bxd6 30. Qxd6) 30. Bc5+ Ka8 31. Qa5# { White wins by checkmate. } 1-0